Photography versus the Human Eye
Photographs are often considered to be "accurate" portrayals of visual scenes. However,
photographs do not record images in the same way that the human eye would respond
to the identical scenes. For the following discussion, we will ignore special techniques,
such as use of artificial lights (flash), filters, unusual films, etc. The discussion will
focus on natural-light photography under sunlit conditions. There are several fundamental
ways in which photographic images differ from what is seen by the human eye.
- Field of View -- Camera lens focal length determines the field of view which is
focused onto the film. A focal length of ~100 mm (for 35-mm format film) approximates human
vision in the central zone of the visual field, in which human color discrimination is best.
A wide-angle lens compresses more field of view onto the film; whereas a telephoto lens
severely limits (crops) the field of view. The human eye provides for an extremely wide angle
of peripheral vision--160° to 170° in most people. This peripheral vision is good
for recognition of black-white patterns and detection of movement, but has almost no color
capability. Photographs do not provide any peripheral field of view.
- Latitude -- Latitude refers to the range of highlights and dark features that are
properly exposed in a photograph. Color-slide film has a total latitude of about five stops
(Shaw 1994). Assuming the mid-tone of the scene is correctly exposed, this means that brighter
or darker features also will appear correct within ±2½ stops. Features more than 2½
stops brighter will be "burned out" and objects more than 2½ stops darker will be all
black. Digital cameras generally have more restricted latitude. The human eye, in contrast, has a much greater latitude equivalent to 12-14 stops.
- Color Saturation -- The color rendition of color film may be different from the human
eye. People tend to prefer vibrant, rich, saturated colors in photographs. Film makers have
responded to this preference in different ways. Fuji's approach is for color-saturated films;
whereas Kodak films render color as close as possible to reality (Zuckerman 1996). Similar differences are apparent in digital cameras.
Given these and other factors, it should be clear that a photographic image of a scene will be
different in several ways from the human visual impression of that same scene. The photograph
represents a selection of certain elements--field of view, exposure range and color saturation,
which are in general more limited than a human observer would sense. On the other hand, a
photograph is a permanent record of the scene, while the human visual impression is stored
as memory that cannot be reproduced fully for analysis or sharing with others.
Color-Infrared Film
Color-infrared film is sensitive to visible and near-infrared portions of the spectrum. In normal practice, a yellow filter is employed to eliminate blue (and ultraviolet) wavelengths. In some cases, orange or red filters may be used to further restrict visible light from reaching the film. Color-infrared film carries no ISO number; nor do conventional light meters provide correct indications of infrared radiation. Without an ISO bar code on the film case, most cameras cannot make automatic settings. Therefore, taking photographs with color-infrared film requires manual settings for exposure based on estimates of available light. When using a film without an ISO rating, most cameras will default to ISO 100 for setting adjustments. The following table gives manual corrections for color-infrared film.
Manual compensation for SFAP color-infrared
film for default value of ISO 100.
Lighting conditions | Exposure correction*
| Very bright sun, mid-day--clean, dry atmosphere
| ISO 200 (+1 f-stop) |
| Light, but not bright sun--hazy, humid, dusty air
| ISO 160 (+½ f-stop) |
| Slightly overcast, indirect light--thin clouds
| ISO 100 (no correction) |
| Pale, diffuse light--early morning or late afternoon
| ISO 80 (-½ f-stop) |
| Overcast, indirect, rather dark--heavy clouds
| ISO 50 (-1 f-stop) | |
* Based on Pentax SLR camera with 50 mm lens
and orange filter (Marzolff, pers. com. 1998).
Given that most SFAP will take place under bright, sunny conditions, color-infrared film can be treated as ISO 200 according to Marzolff's settings. Following the sunny f/16 rule of thumb, the camera setting should be equivalent to shutter speed 1/250 and f/16. However, other camera/lens combinations may produce quite different results. The author formerly used a Canon Rebel SLR camera with a zoom lens for color-infrared kite aerial photographs (Aber et al. 2001). Best settings are 1/250 shutter speed and f-11 for full sun and active vegetation. Aside from these empirical results, aerial photography with color-infrared film remains an uncertain proposition--results cannot be predicted well. A final, and nearly insurmountable problem is that most photo laboratories are no longer willing to develop color-infrared film.
Digital infrared imagery is also possible. The CCDs of most digital cameras are sensitive to near-infrared radiation; however, some cameras exclude infrared energy with a filter. For those digital cameras without infrared-blocking filters, it is possible to acquire infrared images by blocking visible light with a filter. The only drawback at present is the relatively low sensitivity of conventional CCDs to near-infrared radiation. Thus, relatively long exposure times (1/30th second) are required.
Recently a practical digital color-infrared camera has been developed and marketed by Tetracam. The size, weight and functionality of this camera make it suitable for small-format aerial photography from manned or unmanned platforms. Its primary purpose is to collect vegetation indices for agriculture, foresty, and related applications. With a price tag of $5000, however, flying one on a kite might be rather risky!
ADC camera by Tetracam.
Related sites
References
- Aber, J.S., Aber, S.W. and Leffler, B. 2001. Challenge of infrared kite aerial photography. Kansas Academy Science, Transactions 104:18-27. See full article.
- Caulfield, P. 1987. Capturing the landscape with your camera. Amphoto, Watson-Guptill Publications, New York, 160 p.
- Shaw, J. 1994. John Shaw's landscape photography. Amphoto, Watson-Guptill Publications, New York, 144 p.
- Zuckerman, J. 1996. Techniques of natural light photography. Writer's Digest Books, Cincinnati, Ohio, 134 p.

Return to SFAP schedule.
ES 555 © J.S. Aber (2008).