|
History of Geology |

Born: 1880, Berlin, Germany.
Died: 1930, Greenland Ice Sheet.
| Abstract | Introduction |
| Major work | Resistance to Wegener |
| Historical assessment | Related websites |
Wegener first presented his theory of continental drift in 1912 at a meeting of the German Geological Association. In 1915, he published his evidence and conclusions in a now classic book, Die entstehung der kontinente und ozeane (The origin of continents and oceans). Wegener proposed that all modern continents were once assembled together in a supercontinent he named Pangaea. Pangaea, he thought, had existed since the beginning of the earth and had begun breaking apart during the Mesozoic. He believed tidal forces were responsible for breaking up Pangaea and causing the continents to drift.
Wegener's theory of continental drift was generally criticized on both geophysical and geological grounds. However, post-World War II oceanographic evidence and development of plate tectonic theory in the 1960s have vindicated Wegener's basic conclusion that modern continents are drifted fragments of Pangaea.
| Space-shuttle photograph of Greenland. View toward the northern horizon showing the southern and central portions of Greenland. All land and the ice sheet are snow-covered, and sea ice is present along the coast in this winter view. The exploration of Greenland was a major focus in Wegener's life. Space-shuttle photograph STS45-152-104, 3/92. Obtained from the NASA Johnson Space Center. |
After the war, Wegener succeeded his father-in-law as director of meteorological research at the Department of Marine Observatory, Hamburg. He was not well received. In 1924, he became chair of meteorology and geophysics at the University of Graz, Austria, where he found colleagues more receptive to his research efforts. In effect, Wegener was rejected in his own country. He died (of heart attack?) while leading a third expedition to Greenland at age 50.
Early 20th century geologists viewed continents as fixed features that could rise and fall,
but not move sideways. Slow shrinking of the Earth was considered to be the cause of mountain
building. Connections of former land bridges and seaways could explain all stratigraphy and
distributions of fossils. This was essentially the Atlantis myth of appearing and
disappearing continents. Wegener noted several inconsistencies.
Wegener's best evidence was paleoclimatic indicators, and his best reconstruction of Pangaea
was for late Paleozoic--Carboniferous and Permian (Schwarzbach 1986). His reconstructions
include glaciation around the South Pole, tropical coal belt, and sub-tropical desert belts.
In spite of overwhelming geological evidence in support of Pangaea, the idea was not generally
accepted. The only strong support came from geologists in the southern hemisphere--the Gondwana
region, where the geological evidence for Pangaea is most compeling. However, then as now,
southern hemisphere scientists were few in number and well outside the "mainstream" of
scientific thinking.
American geology was held in high regard in the early 20th century, and such overwhelming
rejection of continental drift put an end to serious scientific discussion of the idea for
the next four decades. It could be argued that AAPG was not an appropriate body to render
a decision on Wegener's ideas. Consider the state of petroleum geology at the time. Oil
and gas were produced only from land areas; no offshore oil wells were drilled until after
World War II. Petroleum geologists were land-based continental geologists; they had no
experience, interest, or appreciation for marine geology of the ocean basins. Furthermore,
petroleum geology was (and still is) an applied aspect of the profession. The goal is to
find oil and gas, not to understand basic principles of earth history and tectonics. AAPG
had no economic incentive to consider the possible implications of continental drift.
Aside from the apparent bias of the AAPG, several other factors may have contributed to the
rejection of Wegener's ideas. These factors often come into play whenever a radical new
theory is introduced into a mature scientific discipline.
For Wegener, continental drift was interesting, but peripheral to his main focus in meteorology
and Greenland. He made important contributions in both these subject areas, but continental
drift is surely his most significant scientific work. He was not correct about certain aspects,
for example the primeval origin of Pangaea or tidal force as the driving mechanism. Nonetheless,
he got the basic idea right, and his hypothesis can be regarded as a forerunner of modern plate
tectonics.
Return to history of geology syllabus or schedule.Major Work
Wegener's most notable scientific contribution was his hypothesis of continental drifting,
which he first presented in 1912 at a meeting of the German Geological Association. In
1915 he published his evidence and conclusions in a now classic book--Die Entstehung der
Kontinente und Ozeane (The origin of continents and oceans). This work was completely
contrary to contemporary views of the day.
A unified hypothesis for origin of the continents was Wegener's attempt to explain this
situation. Eduard Suess had earlier proposed the existence of Gondwana(land), which
was a megacontinent that included all modern southern continents (S. America, Africa/Arabia,
India, Australia, and Antarctica). Wegener went one step further and proposed that all
continents had once been joined in a supercontinent he named Pangaea (meaning all land).
Pangaea, he thought, had existed from the primordial earth until the Mesozoic, when it began to
break up. Wegener at first considered mantle convection as a possible driving mechanism, but
later rejected that in favor of tidal force as the cause for Pangaea's breakup and continental
drift.
Resistance to Wegener's Hypothesis
Resistance to the hypothesis of continental drift came from two main sources--geophysicists
and American geologists. Geophysicists were able to demonstrate that tidal force is far too
weak to move continents through a viscous mantle. To accomplish this would require tidal
forces so great that the Earth would be torn apart. Without a plausible physical mechanism
for continental drift, many people considered the whole idea ridiculous. In 1926, the
American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG) held a special symposium on the hypothesis
of continental drift. AAPG was and still is one the largest and most influential geological
organizations in the world. Nearly every aspect of continental drift was criticized.
With the view of historical analysis, it seems clear that Wegener and continental drift fit
a pattern that has been repeated many times in geology as well as other scientific disciplines.
As a discipline matures through time, complacency and authority develop, such that new ideas
become increasingly difficult to accept. Those who are trained in the discipline "learn" a
body of data, facts, methods, and theories which are taken to be literally true. To suggest
otherwise may not be in the best interest of a person's reputation and career. Most
practitioners of a discipline, thus, have "closed minds" to anything outside the normal
dimensions of their work. This was the situation into which Wegener ventured with his
hypothesis of continental drift.Historical Assessment
Hindsight has, of course, vindicated Wegener's basic conclusion that all modern continents
are rifted and drifted fragments of Pangaea. Key evidence came from oceanographic studies
in the 1950s and '60s. Geologists were forced to accept continental drift as part of plate
tectonics, as overwhelming evidence poured in from other disciplines. All this was virtually
unknown to Wegener. Consider what was known and not known at the beginning of
the 20th century.
State of geological knowledge at beginning of 20th century.Well Known Poorly Known
Geology of temperate lowland regions in Europe, North America, South Africa,
India, Australia
Geology of tropical, desert, polar, and montane regions in South America,
Asia, Greenland, Antarctica, central Africa, Arabia
Geology of oceanic islands--New Zealand, Hawaii, Iceland, Japan
Geology of all ocean basins
Relative ages of strata and fossils
Absolute ages of strata and fossils
Basic geophysics--magnetism, gravity, earthquakes
Interior structure of the earth, radioactivity
Physical properties of rocks in near-surface environment
High pressure-temperature rock behavior
Related websites
Reference

GO 521 © J.S. Aber (2007).